The NY Times reports that while some companies have raised the prices on their medications double the inflation rate, 3-7 million seniors are expected to hit the "donut hole," a gap in drug coverage where they will have to spend about $3,000 out of their own pockets to climb out of. According to The Times:
But Wall Street analysts say they have little doubt that the benefit program, called Part D, has helped several big drug makers report record profits and exceed earnings forecasts made earlier in the year.Companies have raised prices on many top-selling medicines by 6 percent or more this year, double the overall inflation rate. In some cases, drug makers have received price increases of as much as 20 percent for medicines that the government was already buying for people covered under the Medicaid program for the indigent. Medicare also pays more than the Veterans Administration, which runs its own benefit program.
“Part D was a good thing for almost everybody,” said Les Funtleyder, an industry analyst at Miller Tabak, a research firm in New York.
Drug makers have tried to play down their gains from the program because they do not want to be seen as profiteering in an election year, Mr. Funtleyder said. “You don’t want to draw too much attention to how good it’s been.”
Republicans say that the benefit program is working, and costs less than was expected. The Democrats have said that if they take control of Congress, they will introduce legislation that will allow Medicare to negotiate with drug companies for lower drug prices.
Right now, Medicare is specifically prohibited from doing this. Currently, the Veteran's Administration does it for veterans.
The Minority Staff of the Committee on Government reform recently estimated that Americans could save $61 billion over the next decade if Medicare negotiated lower prices from the industry.
Regardless of what happens with the election tomorrow, issues with Medicare Part D are not going to go away any time soon.
2 Posted by Charles at 11/09/06 11:57 AMThe simple truth about the whole Medicare Part D lie is that it was never intended to benefit anyone other than the stockholders of and executives (their compensation packages) of the pharmaceuticals.
The bill was written by PhRMA lobbyists and that's just a fact.
Like every other move by the Bush administration and the power-mad Republicans made was to benefit them and the most wealthy Americans and corporate interests.
Pharmaceuticals have one of the highest profit margins of any business in the US. The lies they have tried to sell with their out and out lying commercials about where the money they make going to develop new meds is a bald-faced lie. Much of the money to develop new meds comes from the taxpayers through the National Institutes of Health. For that matter, almost all businesses have to invest in R & D in connection with growing their businesses. Why should pharmaceuticals be exempt?
The empathy-seeking pharmaceutical commercials are filled with the sincere faces of employees (or actors) and doctors (or actors) telling how we're all in this together. Well, we ARE NOT all in this together. Furthermore, those of us who cannot afford our meds derive little or no benefit from the promised miracle drugs of the future.
The longer I live the more I believe that health issues just may not belong in the hands of the for-profits. The old and tired belief that competition is good in these areas is composed of the same stuff as those mounds in cow pastures that one should avoid stepping in. Yes, there is competition but the consumer rarely, if ever, derives any benefit from that competition. I assure you from the bottom of my heart that the CEO's and COO's etc of these firms ultimately do not care about anything other than their compensation and keeping stockholders happy. If these executives wish to disagree they must remember that actions ALWAYS speak louder than words.
Americans have long been 'raped' at the cash register for the meds they need while the exact same meds are sold all over the world for a fraction of what we must pay. Team this with the protectionist Bush administration that has fought re-importation of meds to the US at much lower prices and it is clear that we can expect little or no help in this struggle from the paharmaceutical industry nor from the US government unless things really change with the new House and Senate.
Demand real change. All Americans deserve to have access to the medications they need to live.
3 Posted by Dot Nelson at 11/13/06 06:17 AMPeople here demanding cheaper drugs are not as informed as their conclusory statements make them sound.
If you like having modern medicine you should thank drug companies who fund basically all research, university and otherwise. They also give away a substantial amount of free drugs to those who cannot afford insurance but make too much money to get medicare/medicaid. It's not perfect but if the drug companies were not profit driven we would have 1970's medication because there would be no incentive or financial way for very smart people to spend decades creating new drugs. Socialised medicine will give us cheap and vastly inferior medical treatment as we watch the profession fail to make any new discoveries, or create new drugs. This is what Europe has. Do you want that? I have lived there and their medical system does not hold a candle to ours, even though ours is far from perfect.
I'm not a conservative person but some of this should be known and posted on websites geared specically toward the downfall of drug companies in order to be better informed and to fix the problems we as a nation are faced.
4 Posted by Marcellus E. Connor at 11/15/06 08:12 PMI am a retired health care professional in the state of Virginia and enrolled in the Medicare D program through the Medco Health System with prescription drug coverage. I was receiving 90 day supply of two of my medicataions for $54 and now that cost to me has skyrocketed to over $355 the last time I checked the price.
THANK YOU FOR NOTHING PRESIDENT BUSH.
5 Posted by BaileyJeanBaker at 11/21/06 04:22 PMIt is very important that the Congress do something about Medicare Part D as it currently stands. It has the feeling and appearance that it was not put in place for the benefit of the people at large, but for a specific group who probably has no need for it, and who stands to make a lot of money as a result of it. Everything in the bill as passed needs to be revisited, and those items that are found to be a hindrance to the population who needs it the most, rewritten, changed or taken out. It is the long range impact of this legislation that will have the greatest effect upon those who need the benefits it could offer the most.
You are all talking about the big pharma companies. I worked for one and they had 48,000 in a budget for a departmental christmas party. Not a whole company, but this was one department. Of course Managed Care was involved. They do know how to hit that pocket and make sure where the money comes from and where they will spend it. Feeding themselves. "All the little piggies in their piggy world". It is disgraceful what big pharma is doing. The money spent entertaining themselves is a crime. Weekly drunken trips for a good time (call it a meeting). If you worked in one you would know that a soap opera is mild to what goes on behind those closed doors.