DOCTOR’S RESPONSIBILITY
However, regardless of the type of crime, it should be borne in mind that a doctor can be held criminally responsible for a crime against the life or health of a patient in connection with a medical procedure (understood in the broad sense of the term, i.e. including diagnosis, therapy and Prevention of diseases) only in the event of a culpable medical error.
ismp medication safety alert, regardless of the type of crime
Guilt can take the form of intentional guilt, guilt with direct intent, when the perpetrator wants to cause harm, as well as with possible intent, when the perpetrator does not want to cause harm, but, being aware of the possibility of causing it, behaves in a way that can lead to this and accepts the possible consequences of this. Involuntary guilt can occur as recklessness, when the perpetrator expects that his behavior can cause harm, but baselessly believes that harm will not occur, and finally as gross negligence, when the perpetrator did not foresee the possibility of harm, although he could and should have foreseen it.
Thus, the main, though not the only, issue around which criminal law is focused is the qualification of the psychological attitude, that is, the guilt of the perpetrator, which determines the penalization of his actions.
The disciplinary sphere of medical liability is regulated by the provisions of the law on medical chambers, which in Chapter V defines ismp medication safety alert the so-called “professional misconduct”. Members of medical boards are subject to professional liability for violations of the principles of medical ethics and regulations related to the practice of the medical profession ismp medication safety alert.
The essence of professional responsibility with ismp safety alert
The principles of professional ethics are defined by the code of medical ethics adopted by the extraordinary second national congress of medical chambers in 1991, revised in 1993 and 2003. The essence of professional responsibility is to penalize a situation in which a doctor violates the obligations that make up the content and social function of the profession, acts contrary to the principles of deontology and professional ethics, violating the dignity of the profession, for example ismp safety alert, through actions or behaviors that undermine confidence in the medical profession, actions contrary to the social function of the profession or behavior incompatible with the vocation of the medical profession.
Such actions may consist of m.in. on the failure to fulfill professional duty, violation of the rules related to the exercise of the profession, but also non-compliance with ismp safety alert the resolutions of the authorities and local authorities of doctors. This area in this study remains beyond our interest.