Share this site! The Safe Patient Project is a Consumers Union campaign focused on eliminating medical harm, improving FDA oversight of prescription drugs and promoting disclosure laws that give information to consumers about health care safety and quality.

Cost of having it replaced should be covered with some exceptions

What I would expect from a good warranty:
If there were problems due to a defect in the implant, the cost of having it replaced should be covered. Excluded from the warranty would be problems that develop as a result of poorly done surgery or poor fit (the surgeon should make certain the implant fits properly – the manufacturer can not know what the proper fit is. Also, problems arising from bone rejection of the implant would not be covered, unless there are a high number of rejections from that particular implant. In that case, the materials are apparently at fault.
Deborah’s story:
I had a hip replacement last year due to severe osteoarthritis damage, and so far I couldn’t be happier. Although made by Depuy, it is not a metal on metal implant. After 3 years of terrible pain, I have been completely pain free since the surgery, and I have regained mobility in the joint that I had lost. I was told all the precautions and possible problems with getting an implant, and fortunately, so far, I have not encountered any problems. I was told the expected useful life of the implant was 20 years, but beyond the 20 years there is only a 5% failure rate for each additional year. I am currently 62 years old.